{"draft":"draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00","doc_id":"RFC4966","title":"Reasons to Move the Network Address Translator - Protocol Translator (NAT-PT) to Historic Status","authors":["C. Aoun","E. Davies"],"format":["ASCII","HTML"],"page_count":"25","pub_status":"INFORMATIONAL","status":"INFORMATIONAL","source":"IPv6 Operations","abstract":"This document discusses issues with the specific form of IPv6-IPv4\r\nprotocol translation mechanism implemented by the Network Address\r\nTranslator - Protocol Translator (NAT-PT) defined in RFC 2766.  These\r\nissues are sufficiently serious that recommending RFC 2766 as a\r\ngeneral purpose transition mechanism is no longer desirable, and this\r\ndocument recommends that the IETF should reclassify RFC 2766 from\r\nProposed Standard to Historic status.  This memo provides information for the Internet community.","pub_date":"July 2007","keywords":["NAT-PT","v6ops"],"obsoletes":["RFC2766"],"obsoleted_by":[],"updates":[],"updated_by":[],"see_also":[],"doi":"10.17487\/RFC4966","errata_url":"https:\/\/www.rfc-editor.org\/errata\/rfc4966"}